I recently posted a snippet on another dear blogger's site re: Mitt Romney's behavior while on the campaign trail. As I wrote my two pences' worth, I had a feeling that someone would respond negatively, so I wrote only facts, and my feelings in response to said facts. One can't really argue with facts, right? Well, I guess one can. I guess one can 'vehemently disagree', as another poster did, with things that have actually transpired.
So, again, here are the facts:
Mitt Romney doubts success of LDN Olympics during his recent London visit.
Romney confuses 'sikh' with 'sheikh' during a tribute to the Wisconsin sikh temple shooting victims.
I know it's a new year, new leaf, new attitude, and new what-not, but I can't shake feeling bugged about the same old things. Here...
Last night, a group of women (& one 'male ally') met up to make Jan 21 march signs at the local offices of an organization dedi...
Reading first-hand accounts by women who were preyed upon by Weinstein has sparked some memories of my own. I have never had a massive dud...